Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Russell v. State

Russell v. State

697 So. 2d 924, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8422, 1997 WL 408713
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 656 So. 2d 203 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 1997·No. No. 95-04953·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences but reverse the written sentence insofar as it does not conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement that all three sentences are to run concurrently. The sentence should be corrected on remand to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement.

Convictions and sentences affirmed as orally pronounced; reversed and remanded for correction of written sentence.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 697 So. 2d 924, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8422, 1997 WL 408713 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

697 So. 2d 924 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.