Russell v. State

693 So. 2d 599, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2347, 1997 WL 106827
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 656 So. 2d 203
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 1997·No. No. 95-02171·Published

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

We affirm Clarence Russell’s judgments and sentences. We remand this case to the circuit court to amend the written judgment to reflect that the conviction for count one was for a second-degree misdemeanor in violation of section 784.011, Florida Statutes (1993). Additionally, in order to conform to its oral pronouncement, we direct the court to amend the sentencing and probation documents to reflect that the $250 court costs were imposed in the form of a lien. Russell’s presence is not required for these clerical corrections.

Judgments and sentences affirmed; remanded for clerical corrections.

THREADGILL, C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 693 So. 2d 599, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2347, 1997 WL 106827 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

693 So. 2d 599 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.