Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Russell v. State

Russell v. State

641 So. 2d 972, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8702, 1994 WL 483784
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 656 So. 2d 203 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1994·No. No. 94-02884·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of this motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We note that the trial court mistakenly believed the issues described in grounds 2 and 3 of the motion had been raised on direct appeal. Nonetheless, as pleaded, those grounds are facially insufficient. Accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to the prisoner filing another motion that raises these grounds with greater specificity.

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 641 So. 2d 972, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8702, 1994 WL 483784 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

641 So. 2d 972 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.