Russell v. State

616 So. 2d 642, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4732, 1993 WL 130959
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 656 So. 2d 203
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 1993·No. No. 92-1968·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant first claims the trial court erred in finding him to be in violation of community control. The record supports three of the five violations which the trial court found to exist. We find the other issue raised to be without merit. Accordingly, we affirm.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., ANSTEAD, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell v. State, 616 So. 2d 642, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4732, 1993 WL 130959 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

616 So. 2d 642 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.