Russell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Russell v. State

641 So. 2d 972, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8702, 1994 WL 483784

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 9, 1994

DocketNo. 94-02884

StatusPublished

This text of 641 So. 2d 972 (Russell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Russell v. State, 641 So. 2d 972, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8702, 1994 WL 483784 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of this motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We note that the trial court mistakenly believed the issues described in grounds 2 and 3 of the motion had been raised on direct appeal. Nonetheless, as pleaded, those grounds are facially insufficient. Accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to the prisoner filing another motion that raises these grounds with greater specificity.

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of this motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We note that the trial court mistakenly believed the issues described in grounds 2 and 3 of the motion had been raised on direct appeal. Nonetheless, as pleaded, those grounds are facially insufficient. Accordingly, this affirmance is without prejudice to the prisoner filing another motion that raises these grounds with greater specificity.

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

641 So. 2d 972, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8702, 1994 WL 483784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/russell-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.