Russell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Russell v. State

734 So. 2d 1060, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14392, 1998 WL 821845

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Russell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 725 So. 2d 1274 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 1998·No. No. 97-2779·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Otis Eugene Russell appeals judgments and sentences in Case No. 96-163 after he admitted to a violation of his probation and in Case No. 97-34 after a jury trial. The public defender has filed an Anders brief that suggests that a certain assessment of costs was improper. We decline to reach this issue, finding it was not properly preserved for appeal. Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)(en banc).

In Case No. 97-34, Russell was convicted of battery on count II and was sentenced pursuant to a “Disposition Memorandum.” This document, however, fails to reflect that the court granted a judgment of acquittal as to the felony charged in count I. Accordingly, while we affirm the judgment and sentence, we remand with directions to enter a corrected sentencing document which properly memorializes the outcome of the trial proceedings.

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

JOANOS, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Otis Eugene Russell appeals judgments and sentences in Case No. 96-163 after he admitted to a violation of his probation and in Case No. 97-34 after a jury trial. The public defender has filed an Anders brief that suggests that a certain assessment of costs was improper. We decline to reach this issue, finding it was not properly preserved for appeal. Locke v. State, 719 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)(en banc).

In Case No. 97-34, Russell was convicted of battery on count II and was sentenced pursuant to a “Disposition Memorandum.” This document, however, fails to reflect that the court granted a judgment of acquittal as to the felony charged in count I. Accordingly, while we affirm the judgment and sentence, we remand with directions to enter a corrected sentencing document which properly memorializes the outcome of the trial proceedings.

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

JOANOS, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Russell v. State, 734 So. 2d 1060, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14392, 1998 WL 821845 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

734 So. 2d 1060 (Russell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related