Rudolph v. State
230 So. 2d 14
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 1970
DocketNo. 69-274
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 230 So. 2d 14 (Rudolph v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rudolph v. State, 230 So. 2d 14 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).
Opinion
Rudolph’s allegation that his plea of guilty to the charge of murder in the first degree was coerced is not refuted by the brief voir dire prior to reception of the plea. He is thus entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his petition. Cf. Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App., 228 So.2d 446, November 26, 1969.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tucker v. State
243 So. 2d 186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Flores v. Wainwright
240 So. 2d 816 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Rudolph v. Wainwright
238 So. 2d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Littles v. State
235 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Winegard v. State
234 So. 2d 166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Young v. State
233 So. 2d 178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
230 So. 2d 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolph-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.