Rudolph v. State
230 So. 2d 14
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 1970·No. No. 69-274·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Rudolph’s allegation that his plea of guilty to the charge of murder in the first degree was coerced is not refuted by the brief voir dire prior to reception of the plea. He is thus entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his petition. Cf. Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App., 228 So.2d 446, November 26, 1969.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rudolph v. State, 230 So. 2d 14 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).
230 So. 2d 14 (Rudolph v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tucker v. State
243 So. 2d 186 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Flores v. Wainwright
240 So. 2d 816 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Rudolph v. Wainwright
238 So. 2d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Littles v. State
235 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Winegard v. State
234 So. 2d 166 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Young v. State
233 So. 2d 178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)