Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Tucker v. State

Tucker v. State

243 So. 2d 186
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Tucker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8132 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 22, 1971·No. No. 69-702·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Tucker alleges that as a result of threats and coercive treatment, he made statements which were used against him to force him into pleading guilty. Nothing in the record refutes his allegations, and Tucker therefore should be granted an evidentiary hearing. Rudolph v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 14; Cf. Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. State, 243 So. 2d 186 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

243 So. 2d 186 (Tucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steinhauser v. State
228 So. 2d 446 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Rudolph v. State
230 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)