Tucker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Tucker v. State

243 So. 2d 186

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 22, 1971

DocketNo. 69-702

StatusPublished

This text of 243 So. 2d 186 (Tucker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tucker v. State, 243 So. 2d 186 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Tucker alleges that as a result of threats and coercive treatment, he made statements which were used against him to force him into pleading guilty. Nothing in the record refutes his allegations, and Tucker therefore should be granted an evidentiary hearing. Rudolph v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 14; Cf. Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Tucker alleges that as a result of threats and coercive treatment, he made statements which were used against him to force him into pleading guilty. Nothing in the record refutes his allegations, and Tucker therefore should be granted an evidentiary hearing. Rudolph v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 14; Cf. Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 So. 2d 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tucker-v-state-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack