Tucker v. State

227 So. 2d 57, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5018
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1969·No. No. 69-374·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 675; Kirkland v. State, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 774; Marti v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 163 So.2d 506; Childs v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 605; Amaral v. State, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 549; Ford v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 33, and Manning v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 203 So.2d 360.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tucker v. State, 227 So. 2d 57, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5018 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

227 So. 2d 57 (Tucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Childs v. State
190 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Manning v. State
203 So. 2d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Marti v. State
163 So. 2d 506 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Kirkland v. State
165 So. 2d 774 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Ford v. State
210 So. 2d 33 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Amaral v. State
171 So. 2d 549 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Smith v. State
180 So. 2d 675 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)