Young v. State
This text of 233 So. 2d 178 (Young v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Young’s petition under CrPR 1.850, 33 F.S.A. was denied prior to our decision in Rudolph v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 14, in which allegations of erroneous reception of a guilty plea not refuted by the record were held to entitle the petitioner to an evidentiary hearing. Accordingly, the order is reversed for further proceedings. See also Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 228 So.2d 446. Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed. 2d 274, although it did not involve a post-conviction petition, is instructive.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 So. 2d 178, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/young-v-state-fladistctapp-1970.