Rudolph v. Wainwright

238 So. 2d 455
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 1970·No. No. 70-258·Published

Opinion

MANN, Judge.

The record at the time of Rudolph’s guilty plea was inadequate to show volun-tariness, so we reversed summary denial of his post-conviction petition. Rudolph v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 14. The record of the evidentiary hearing held thereafter does not refute Rudolph’s claim that he was not given notice of the denial of his petition in time to appeal. Respondent concedes in his response to this petition for habeas corpus that he cannot refute this allegation and questions whether further hearing would be useful. We agree. See Cappetta v. Wainwright, Fla.1967, 203 So.2d 609.

Accordingly, we issue the writ to afford appellate review in the manner provided in Baggett v. Wainwright, Fla.1969, 229 So.2d 239.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rudolph v. Wainwright, 238 So. 2d 455 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

238 So. 2d 455 (Rudolph v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baggett v. Wainwright
229 So. 2d 239 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)
Cappetta v. Wainwright
203 So. 2d 609 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Rudolph v. State
230 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)