Roy Upshaw and R&S Upshaw Franchising, LLC v. Lacado, LLC, Andrew K. Wilson, Cade Wilson, and Carrd, LLC
This text of Roy Upshaw and R&S Upshaw Franchising, LLC v. Lacado, LLC, Andrew K. Wilson, Cade Wilson, and Carrd, LLC (Roy Upshaw and R&S Upshaw Franchising, LLC v. Lacado, LLC, Andrew K. Wilson, Cade Wilson, and Carrd, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth No. 02-20-00031-CV
ROY UPSHAW AND R&S UPSHAW § On Appeal from the 96th District Court FRANCHISING, LLC, Appellants § of Tarrant County (096-293316-17)
V. § July 22, 2021
LACADO, LLC; ANDREW K. WILSON; § Opinion by Justice Walker CADE WILSON; AND CARRD, LLC, Appellees
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there
was error in part of the trial court’s final judgment. It is ordered that the final
judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. We reverse that
portion of the trial court’s final judgment awarding attorney’s fees in favor of appellee
Lacado, LLC and remand the attorney’s-fees issue to the trial court for a new trial.
We affirm the remainder the trial court’s final judgment.
It is further ordered that all parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal, for
which let execution issue. SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By /s/ Brian Walker Justice Brian Walker
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roy Upshaw and R&S Upshaw Franchising, LLC v. Lacado, LLC, Andrew K. Wilson, Cade Wilson, and Carrd, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roy-upshaw-and-rs-upshaw-franchising-llc-v-lacado-llc-andrew-k-texapp-2021.