Ross v. State
680 So. 2d 611, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10382, 1996 WL 571162
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ross v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 726 So. 2d 317 →
Opinion
Because the written sentencing order does not comport with the court’s oral pronouncement of a five year term of imprisonment for carrying a concealed firearm, the written sentence is vacated in this regard and the case is remanded for imposition of the sentence which was orally pronounced. See, e.g., Evans v. State, 625 So.2d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The appealed order is otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ross v. State, 680 So. 2d 611, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10382, 1996 WL 571162 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
680 So. 2d 611 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Evans v. State
625 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)