Evans v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Evans v. State

619 So. 2d 520, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6703, 1993 WL 214611

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 1993

DocketNo. 91-2707

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 619 So. 2d 520 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evans v. State, 619 So. 2d 520, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6703, 1993 WL 214611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders¹ appeal, we find no reversible error with respect to appellant’s convictions for burglary, grand theft of a firearm, and third degree grand theft. We write only to address Evans’ argument that the state failed to present sufficient evidence to establish the fair market value of the stolen property at the time of the theft, such proof being essential to a conviction for third degree grand theft. This issue, raised by Evans, himself, was not raised before the trial court and therefore, may not be raised for the first time on appeal. Santini v. State, 404 So.2d 843 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Because this issue was not properly preserved for appellate review, we express no opinion on the merits of appellant’s argument.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders¹ appeal, we find no reversible error with respect to appellant’s convictions for burglary, grand theft of a firearm, and third degree grand theft. We write only to address Evans’ argument that the state failed to present sufficient evidence to establish the fair market value of the stolen property at the time of the theft, such proof being essential to a conviction for third degree grand theft. This issue, raised by Evans, himself, was not raised before the trial court and therefore, may not be raised for the first time on appeal. Santini v. State, 404 So.2d 843 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Because this issue was not properly preserved for appellate review, we express no opinion on the merits of appellant’s argument.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

619 So. 2d 520, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6703, 1993 WL 214611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack