Ross v. State

656 So. 2d 568, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6393, 1995 WL 353629
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 14, 1995
DocketNo. 93-02258
StatusPublished

This text of 656 So. 2d 568 (Ross v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ross v. State, 656 So. 2d 568, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6393, 1995 WL 353629 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

THREADGILL, Judge.

Jerry Lee Ross appeals his judgments and sentences for armed burglary, grand theft, forgery, and fraudulent use of a credit card. We affirm the judgments and sentences, but remand for correction of a clerical error. The judgment for fraudulent use of a credit card reflects a conviction for a third-degree felony. The offense, however, was submitted to the jury as a misdemeanor. The state concedes this error. We therefore affirm, but remand for the judgment to be corrected [569]*569to reflect a first-degree misdemeanor for fraudulent use of a credit card. The appellant need not be present.

Affirmed; remanded.

FRANK, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
656 So. 2d 568, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6393, 1995 WL 353629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ross-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.