Ross v. State

658 So. 2d 571, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6995, 1995 WL 380849
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ross v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 664 So. 2d 1004
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 1995·No. No. 94-02431·Published

Opinion

QUINCE, Judge.

Frederick Gerard Ross appeals his judgments and sentences entered after a jury convicted him of assault on a law enforcement officer and battery on a law enforcement officer. We affirm his convictions but remand to the trial court for further proceedings on the imposition of costs and attorney’s fees.

Appellant argues and we agree that $433.00 in costs/fines were imposed without reference to the statutory basis for such imposition. We strike the costs imposed and [572]*572remand to the trial court for further proceedings. The state may seek to reimpose these costs, and if reimposed the record must contain citation to the proper statutory authority. Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Additionally, we strike the imposition of the $300.00 public defender fee. On remand, the fee may be reimposed after notice and hearing. Richardson v. State, 638 So.2d 619 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. State, 658 So. 2d 571, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6995, 1995 WL 380849 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

658 So. 2d 571 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sutton v. State
635 So. 2d 1032 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Richardson v. State
638 So. 2d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)