Ross v. State

656 So. 2d 568, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6393, 1995 WL 353629
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ross v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 664 So. 2d 1004
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 14, 1995·No. No. 93-02258·Published

Opinion

THREADGILL, Judge.

Jerry Lee Ross appeals his judgments and sentences for armed burglary, grand theft, forgery, and fraudulent use of a credit card. We affirm the judgments and sentences, but remand for correction of a clerical error. The judgment for fraudulent use of a credit card reflects a conviction for a third-degree felony. The offense, however, was submitted to the jury as a misdemeanor. The state concedes this error. We therefore affirm, but remand for the judgment to be corrected [569]*569to reflect a first-degree misdemeanor for fraudulent use of a credit card. The appellant need not be present.

Affirmed; remanded.

FRANK, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross v. State, 656 So. 2d 568, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6393, 1995 WL 353629 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

656 So. 2d 568 (Ross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.