Robinson v. State

427 S.W.3d 891, 2014 WL 1379757, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 387
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 232
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 8, 2014·No. No. ED 99992·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jackie Robinson appeals from the motion court’s “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment” denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 following an evidentiary hearing where he alleged ineffective assistance of plea counsel. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 427 S.W.3d 891, 2014 WL 1379757, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 387 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

427 S.W.3d 891 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.