Robinson v. State

510 S.W.3d 896, 2017 WL 676721
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Robinson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 828
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 2017·No. No. ED 104298·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ceral L. Robinson appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An ex[897]*897tended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 510 S.W.3d 896, 2017 WL 676721 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

510 S.W.3d 896 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.