Robinson v. State

519 S.W.3d 815, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 828, 2017 WL 765916
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 2017·No. No. ED 103301·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Aaron C. Robinson (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request a modification to the self-defense jury in[816] struction to include language hypothesizing the existence of “multiple assailants.”

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Robinson v. State, 519 S.W.3d 815, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 828, 2017 WL 765916 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

519 S.W.3d 815 (Robinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. Hancock
E.D. Missouri, 2025
Robinson v. Waltz
E.D. Missouri, 2021
Robinson v. Lewis
E.D. Missouri, 2020