Robinson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Robinson v. State

510 S.W.3d 896, 2017 WL 676721

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 21, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104298

StatusPublished

This text of 510 S.W.3d 896 (Robinson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robinson v. State, 510 S.W.3d 896, 2017 WL 676721 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ceral L. Robinson appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An ex[897]*897tended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ceral L. Robinson appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An ex[897]*897tended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

510 S.W.3d 896, 2017 WL 676721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robinson-v-state-moctapp-2017.