Roberts v. Security T. S. Bank
This text of 238 P. 673 (Roberts v. Security T. S. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE COURT.
In its application for a writ of supersedeas pending the final determination of this action on appeal the petitioner admits that if the judgment as rendered by the trial court is affirmed in toto no prejudice will be suffered by it. The court has this day handed down its judgment affirming the judgment of the trial court as rendered.
For that reason the writ is denied. *Page 576
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 P. 673, 196 Cal. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roberts-v-security-t-s-bank-cal-1925.