Richmond Television Corp. v. United States

382 U.S. 68, 86 S. Ct. 233, 15 L. Ed. 2d 143, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2407
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 15, 1965
Docket420
StatusPublished
Cited by165 cases

This text of 382 U.S. 68 (Richmond Television Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Richmond Television Corp. v. United States, 382 U.S. 68, 86 S. Ct. 233, 15 L. Ed. 2d 143, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2407 (1965).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. In the light of the representations of the Solicitor General, and an independent examination of the record, we believe . that the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit was mistaken in its view that the petitioner’s amortization claims for the taxable years 1956 and 1957 were not properly before it. Although the record is not free from ambiguity, we take the Court of Appeals to have based its decision on the ground that the petitioner’s amortization claims derived solely from net operating loss deductions carried forward from prior years, and that no additional amortization deductions for 1956 and 1957 were sought. Since we find that the petitioner adequately presented its amortization claims for 1956 and 1957, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case to .that court for the consideration of those claims, without intimation of any kind as to their merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parsons v. Dept. of Rev.
Oregon Tax Court, 2020
Jeffrey Yapp v. Cir
Ninth Circuit, 2020
James Gordon Primus v. Commissioner
2020 T.C. Summary Opinion 2 (U.S. Tax Court, 2020)
Denise Celeste McMillan v. Commissioner
2019 T.C. Memo. 108 (U.S. Tax Court, 2019)
Steven Austin Smith v. Commissioner
2019 T.C. Summary Opinion 12 (U.S. Tax Court, 2019)
Briesmeister v. Dept. of Rev.
Oregon Tax Court, 2019
Fisher v. Comm'r
2016 T.C. Summary Opinion 10 (U.S. Tax Court, 2016)
Tarighi v. Comm'r
2015 T.C. Summary Opinion 28 (U.S. Tax Court, 2015)
Powell v. Comm'r
2014 T.C. Memo. 235 (U.S. Tax Court, 2014)
Gale Jordan v. Commissioner
2013 T.C. Summary Opinion 91 (U.S. Tax Court, 2013)
Shammel v. Department of Revenue
Oregon Tax Court, 2013
Heinbockel v. Comm'r
2013 T.C. Memo. 125 (U.S. Tax Court, 2013)
McPartland v. Comm'r
2012 T.C. Summary Opinion 88 (U.S. Tax Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 U.S. 68, 86 S. Ct. 233, 15 L. Ed. 2d 143, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/richmond-television-corp-v-united-states-scotus-1965.