Republic Systems and Programming, Inc. v. Computer Assistance, Inc., Computer Assistance of Hartford, Inc., Andrew N. Vignola and N. Roger Geddes
This text of 440 F.2d 996 (Republic Systems and Programming, Inc. v. Computer Assistance, Inc., Computer Assistance of Hartford, Inc., Andrew N. Vignola and N. Roger Geddes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We affirm on the opinion of Judge Blumenfeld in the district court. 322 F.Supp. 619 (D.Conn.1970).
It should be emphasized, as stated in the opinion, that the defendants’ action violated no contractual obligation. Defendants, unlike the employees in Sperry Rand Corp. v. Rothlein, 241 F.Supp. 549, 554, 559 (D.Conn.1964), did not have employment contracts. To impose liability upon the defendants for failure to notify their employer before terminating their employment would, in effect, grant to their employer protection for which it was unwilling to bargain.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 F.2d 996, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/republic-systems-and-programming-inc-v-computer-assistance-inc-ca2-1971.