Republic Systems and Programming, Inc. v. Computer Assistance, Inc., Computer Assistance of Hartford, Inc., Andrew N. Vignola and N. Roger Geddes
Opinions
We affirm on the opinion of Judge Blumenfeld in the district court. 322 F.Supp. 619 (D.Conn.1970).
It should be emphasized, as stated in the opinion, that the defendants’ action violated no contractual obligation. Defendants, unlike the employees in Sperry Rand Corp. v. Rothlein, 241 F.Supp. 549, 554, 559 (D.Conn.1964), did not have employment contracts. To impose liability upon the defendants for failure to notify their employer before terminating their employment would, in effect, grant to their employer protection for which it was unwilling to bargain.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
440 F.2d 996 (Republic Systems and Programming, Inc. v. Computer Assistance, Inc., Computer Assistance of Hartford, Inc., Andrew N. Vignola and N. Roger Geddes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.