Preuss v. United States

192 Ct. Cl. 961, 188 Ct. Cl. 469
United States Court of Claims·Decided July 16, 1969·No. No. 177-64·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

On July 16,1969, the court dismissed certain of plaintiff’s causes of action, dismissed defendant’s first counterclaim, held plaintiff entitled to recover on its sixth cause of action, and held defendant entitled to recover on its second and third counterclaims, the amount of recovery on the latter counterclaim to be determined by the Board of Contract Appeals. This case now comes before the court on defendant’s motion filed February 27, 1970, for summary judgment on its third counterclaim, to which motion plaintiff has filed no response and the time for so filing pursuant to the Buies of the court has expired. On May 1, 1970, the court granted defendant’s motion and entered judgment for defendant on its third counterclaim against plaintiff in the total sum of $370,713.30, together with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from August 4,1961.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Preuss v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 961, 188 Ct. Cl. 469 (cc 1969).

192 Ct. Cl. 961 (Preuss v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Short Bros. PLC v. United States
65 Fed. Cl. 695 (Federal Claims, 2005)
Southeastern Airways Corp. v. United States
673 F.2d 368 (Court of Claims, 1982)
Olson Plumbing & Heating Co. v. United States
602 F.2d 950 (Court of Claims, 1979)
Blake Construction Co. v. United States
585 F.2d 998 (Court of Claims, 1978)
Hicks Corp. v. United States
487 F.2d 520 (Court of Claims, 1973)
National Eastern Corp. v. United States
477 F.2d 1347 (Court of Claims, 1973)
Burlington Northern Inc. v. United States
462 F.2d 526 (Court of Claims, 1972)
Whittaker Corporation v. The United States
443 F.2d 1373 (Court of Claims, 1971)