POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC. v. Tessera, Inc.
This text of 660 F.3d 1301 (POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC. v. Tessera, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC., Plain,tiff-Appellan,t, V. TESSERA, INC., Defenclant-Appellee. 2010-1489 Appeal from the United States District Court for the N0rthern District of California in case no. 10-CV-0945, Judge C1audia Wi1ken. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of the motion to withdraw Ken- neth E. Krosin and to substitute Ge0rge C. Beck as prin- cipal counsel for POWertech Techno10gy Inc., IT IS ORDERED THATZ The motion is granted George C. Beck should promptly file a new entry of appearance as principal counsel
POWERTECH V. TESSERA FEB 03 2011 CC. S Date Kenneth E. Kr0sin, Esq. Ge0rge C. Beck, Esq. Morgan Chu, Esq. 2 FOR THE COURT /s/ J an H0rba1__v; J an Horba1y Clerk me U.8. COURT EALS F0'R THE FE`D€§lL (i`»,I'RCUIT FEB 03 2011 woman am
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
660 F.3d 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powertech-technology-inc-v-tessera-inc-cafc-2011.