FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 111
Stay of certain actions pending disposition of related proceedings before the United States International Trade Commission
28 U.S.C. § 1659
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter111 — GENERAL PROVISIONS
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1659 (Stay of certain actions pending disposition of related proceedings before the United States International Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1659.
Text
(a)Stay.—In a civil action involving parties that are also parties to a proceeding before the United States International Trade Commission under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, at the request of a party to the civil action that is also a respondent in the proceeding before the Commission, the district court shall stay, until the determination of the Commission becomes final, proceedings in the civil action with respect to any claim that involves the same issues involved in the proceeding before the Commission, but only if such request is made within—
(1)30 days after the party is named as a respondent in the proceeding before the Commission, or
(2)30 days after the district court action is filed,
whichever is later.
(b)Use of Commission Record.—Notwithstanding section 337(n)(1)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Virtualagility Inc. v. salesforce.com, Inc.
759 F.3d 1307 (Federal Circuit, 2014)
POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC. v. Tessera, Inc.
660 F.3d 1301 (Federal Circuit, 2011)
Aliphcom v. Fitbit, Inc.
154 F. Supp. 3d 933 (N.D. California, 2015)
Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. v. Jack C. Benun, and Ribi Tech Products Llc, and Polytech Enterprises Ltd. And Polytech (Shenzhen) Camera Co. Ltd.
463 F.3d 1252 (Federal Circuit, 2006)
In Re Princo Corporation and Princo America Corporation
486 F.3d 1365 (Federal Circuit, 2007)
General Electric Co. v. International Trade Commission
692 F.3d 1218 (Federal Circuit, 2012)
ANSELL HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS LLC v. Tillotson Corp.
567 F. Supp. 2d 196 (District of Columbia, 2008)
Kyocera Senco Industrial Tools, Inc. v. Koki Holdings America Ltd.
(D. Delaware, 2022)
Diebold, Incorporated v. Nautilus Hyosung Inc.
(D. Delaware, 2019)
Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. Direct Technologies International, Inc.
(W.D. North Carolina, 2019)
Wuhan Healthgen Biotechnology Corporation, et al. v. Expresstec LLC, et al.; Ventria Bioscience Inc. v. Wuhan Healthgen Biotechnology Corp.
(D. Kansas, 2025)
ZIIP Inc. v. Carol Cole Co.
(S.D. California, 2025)
Viking Therapeutics,Inc. v. Ascletis Bioscience Co., Ltd.
(S.D. California, 2024)
Samsara Inc. v. Motive Technologies Inc.
(N.D. California, 2024)
Vicor Corp. v. FII USA Inc.
132 F.4th 1 (First Circuit, 2025)
Ingevity Corp. v. MAHLE Filter Systems North America, Inc.
(N.D. Illinois, 2023)
Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Maxlinear, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2023)
Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. NXP USA, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2023)
Pathway Innovations and Technologies, Inc. v. IPEVO, Inc.
(S.D. California, 2020)
AGIS Software Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
(E.D. Texas, 2023)
Source Credit
History
(Added Pub. L. 103–465, title III, §321(b)(1)(A), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4945.)
Editorial Notes
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in text, is classified to section 1337 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
The Federal Rules of Evidence and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section applicable with respect to complaints filed under section 1337 of Title 19, Customs Duties, on or after the date on which the World Trade Organization Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], or in cases under section 1337 of Title 19 in which no complaint is filed, with respect to investigations initiated under such section on or after such date, see section 322 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 1337 of Title 19.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11020(b)(4)(A)(ii), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1828, added item 1697.
1964—Pub. L. 88–619, §4(b), Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 996, added item 1696.
References in Text
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in text, is classified to section 1337 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
The Federal Rules of Evidence and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (b), are set out in the Appendix to this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section applicable with respect to complaints filed under section 1337 of Title 19, Customs Duties, on or after the date on which the World Trade Organization Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [Jan. 1, 1995], or in cases under section 1337 of Title 19 in which no complaint is filed, with respect to investigations initiated under such section on or after such date, see section 322 of Pub. L. 103–465, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 1337 of Title 19.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, §11020(b)(4)(A)(ii), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1828, added item 1697.
1964—Pub. L. 88–619, §4(b), Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 996, added item 1696.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1659.