Port Arthur Steam Energy LP v. Oxbow Calcining LLC
This text of Port Arthur Steam Energy LP v. Oxbow Calcining LLC (Port Arthur Steam Energy LP v. Oxbow Calcining LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION Cause Number: 01-12-01165-CV Trial Court Cause Number: 1174311 Style: Port Arthur Steam Energy LP v Oxbow Calcining LLC Date motion filed*: April 19, 2013 Type of motion: Unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: reply brief
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: May 7, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Date Requested: 30 days
Ordered that motion is:
X Granted
If document is to be filed, document due: June 6, 2013
Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland Acting individually
Date: April 22, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Port Arthur Steam Energy LP v. Oxbow Calcining LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/port-arthur-steam-energy-lp-v-oxbow-calcining-llc-texapp-2013.