FEDERAL · 9 U.S.C. · Chapter 1

Same; vacation; grounds; rehearing

9 U.S.C. § 10
Title9Arbitration
Chapter1 — GENERAL PROVISIONS

This text of 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Same; vacation; grounds; rehearing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
9 U.S.C. § 10.

Text

(a)In any of the following cases the United States court in and for the district wherein the award was made may make an order vacating the award upon the application of any party to the arbitration—
(1)where the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means;
(2)where there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators, or either of them;
(3)where the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy; or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced; or
(4)where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted wa

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garrity v. McCaskey
612 A.2d 742 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)
264 case citations
Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance
241 F.R.D. 534 (D. Maryland, 2007)
112 case citations
John P. Biscanin v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
407 F.3d 905 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)
65 case citations
Eljer Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kowin Development Corp.
14 F.3d 1250 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
21 case citations
Bole v. Nationwide Insurance
352 A.2d 472 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
13 case citations
Richard Wawock v. Csi Electrical Contractors
649 F. App'x 556 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
11 case citations
Morgan Stanley DW Inc. v. Afridi
13 A.D.3d 248 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
5 case citations
Sunpoint Securities, Inc. v. Porta
192 F.R.D. 716 (M.D. Florida, 2000)
5 case citations
Crews v. S & S Service Center Inc.
848 F. Supp. 2d 595 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)
5 case citations
Twin Cities Galleries, Llc v. Media Arts Group, Inc.
476 F.3d 598 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
4 case citations
Falls Stamping & Welding Company v. The International Union
575 F.2d 1191 (Sixth Circuit, 1978)
3 case citations
Burlington Insurance v. Trygg-Hansa Insurance
261 F. App'x 631 (Fourth Circuit, 2008)
2 case citations
Sexton v. Karam
648 F. App'x 108 (Second Circuit, 2016)
1 case citations
Sei Societa Esplosivi Industriali Spa v. L-3 Fuzing & Ordnance Systems, Inc.
843 F. Supp. 2d 509 (D. Delaware, 2012)
1 case citations
Ames v. Kippel
(Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Google LLC v. Spivak
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
Bungie Inc v. Aimjunkies.com
(W.D. Washington, 2023)
Nolan v. Holiday Kamper Company, LLC
(D. South Carolina, 2023)

Source Credit

History

(July 30, 1947, ch. 392, 61 Stat. 672; Pub. L. 101–552, §5, Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2745; Pub. L. 102–354, §5(b)(4), Aug. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 946; Pub. L. 107–169, §1, May 7, 2002, 116 Stat. 132.)

Editorial Notes

Derivation
Act Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 213, §10, 43 Stat. 885.

Editorial Notes

Amendments
2002—Subsec. (a)(1) to (4). Pub. L. 107–169, §1(1)–(3), substituted "where" for "Where" and realigned margins in pars. (1) to (4), and substituted a semicolon for period at end in pars. (1) and (2) and "; or" for the period at end in par. (3).
Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 107–169, §1(5), substituted "If an award" for "Where an award", inserted a comma after "expired", and redesignated par. (5) as subsec. (b).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 107–169, §1(4), (5), redesignated subsec. (a)(5) as (b). Former subsec. (b) redesignated (c).
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 107–169, §1(4), redesignated subsec. (b) as (c).
1992—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–354 substituted "section 580" for "section 590" and "section 572" for "section 582".
1990—Pub. L. 101–552 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), in introductory provisions substituted "In any" for "In either", redesignated former subsecs. (a) to (e) as pars. (1) to (5), respectively, and added subsec. (b) which read as follows: "The United States district court for the district wherein an award was made that was issued pursuant to section 580 of title 5 may make an order vacating the award upon the application of a person, other than a party to the arbitration, who is adversely affected or aggrieved by the award, if the use of arbitration or the award is clearly inconsistent with the factors set forth in section 572 of title 5."

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 U.S.C. § 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/9/10.