Port Arthur Steam Energy LP v. Oxbow Calcining LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Port Arthur Steam Energy LP v. Oxbow Calcining LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 13112 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 22, 2013·No. 01-12-01165-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause Number: 01-12-01165-CV Trial Court Cause Number: 1174311 Style: Port Arthur Steam Energy LP v Oxbow Calcining LLC Date motion filed*: April 19, 2013 Type of motion: Unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: reply brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: May 7, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Date Requested: 30 days

Ordered that motion is:

X Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: June 6, 2013

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland Acting individually

Date: April 22, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: May 7, 2013 Number of previous extensions granted: 0 Date Requested: 30 days

Ordered that motion is:

X Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: June 6, 2013

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland Acting individually

Date: April 22, 2013

Port Arthur Steam Energy LP v. Oxbow Calcining LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Port Arthur Steam Energy LP v. Oxbow Calcining LLC (Port Arthur Steam Energy LP v. Oxbow Calcining LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.