Perkins v. State

839 So. 2d 796, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1834, 2003 WL 355444
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 2003·No. No. 4D02-4462·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED without prejudice for the appellant to first exhaust his available administrative remedies through the Department of Corrections, and if that proves unsuccessful, he could then file in the cir[797]*797cuit court a petition seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the DOC to credit him with the full amount of jail and prison time awarded by the trial court. See Rood v. State, 790 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

POLEN, C.J., FARMER and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perkins v. State, 839 So. 2d 796, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1834, 2003 WL 355444 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

839 So. 2d 796 (Perkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seymoore v. State
120 So. 3d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Davis v. State
876 So. 2d 1263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)