Perkins v. State

801 So. 2d 1054, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18248, 2001 WL 1646909
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 2001·No. No. 1D01-1115·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse and remand.

The appellant claims an entitlement to jail-credit in case number 00-71CF for all the time he spent in jail from March 2, 2000, the date that he surrendered his bond in that case, to September 7, 2000, [1055] the date that he was sentenced. The trial court summarily denied the appellant’s facially sufficient motion without any supporting attachments. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying relief and remand to the circuit court with directions to either attach record excerpts that conclusively establish that the appellant is not entitled to the credit he seeks, or to grant the relief sought. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998); Diggs v. State, 727 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Davenport v. State, 664 So.2d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DAVIS, BENTON and BROWNING, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perkins v. State, 801 So. 2d 1054, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18248, 2001 WL 1646909 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

801 So. 2d 1054 (Perkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mancino
714 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Davenport v. State
664 So. 2d 323 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Diggs v. State
727 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)