Perkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Perkins v. State

884 So. 2d 964, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5357, 2004 WL 825592

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 2004·No. No. 1D03-1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585, 587 (Fla. 1st DCA) (rejecting appellant’s argument that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), violated his right to procedural due process, because it did not require a hearing to determine whether he posed a danger to the public), review pending, No. SC03-2219 (Fla. Dec. 18, 2003). Accord Glenn v. State, 861 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Reyes v. State 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585, 587 (Fla. 1st DCA) (rejecting appellant’s argument that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), violated his right to procedural due process, because it did not require a hearing to determine whether he posed a danger to the public), review pending, No. SC03-2219 (Fla. Dec. 18, 2003). Accord Glenn v. State, 861 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Reyes v. State 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

WOLF, C.J., ERVIN and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Perkins v. State, 884 So. 2d 964, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5357, 2004 WL 825592 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

884 So. 2d 964 (Perkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related