Perkins v. State
866 So. 2d 760, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1676, 2004 WL 332756
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Perkins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 842 So. 2d 275 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 2004·No. No. 4D03-4246, 4D03-4775·Published
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to file a sworn motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 to address the scrivener’s error in the sentencing order for case number 02-2119CF10A. See Campbell v. State, 718 So.2d 886 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(holding that the failure of a written sentence to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement cannot be raised in a rule 3.800(a) motion).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Perkins v. State, 866 So. 2d 760, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1676, 2004 WL 332756 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
866 So. 2d 760 (Perkins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Campbell v. State
718 So. 2d 886 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)