Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Seymoore v. State

Seymoore v. State

120 So. 3d 112, 2013 WL 4080975, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12657
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 14, 2013
DocketNo. 4D13-680
StatusPublished

This text of 120 So. 3d 112 (Seymoore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seymoore v. State, 120 So. 3d 112, 2013 WL 4080975, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12657 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of appellant’s Motion for Jail Time Credit is affirmed without prejudice to him to first exhaust his administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections and then, if necessary, petition the circuit court in Leon County for a writ of mandamus to compel the Department to credit him with the jail time awarded by the trial court. Bush v. State, 945 So.2d 1207, 1213-14 (Fla.2006); Perkins v. State, 839 So.2d 796, 797 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Rood v. State, 790 So.2d 1192, 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

WARNER, GROSS and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bush v. State
945 So. 2d 1207 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Rood v. State
790 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Perkins v. State
839 So. 2d 796 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 So. 3d 112, 2013 WL 4080975, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seymoore-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.