Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Soto

People v. Soto

269 A.D.2d 614, 704 N.Y.S.2d 830, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2317
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Soto. Read the opinion of the Court — 259 A.D.2d 904 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 2000·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered September 14, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly concluded there was no Rosario violation (see, CPL 240.45 [1] [a]; People v Banch, 80 NY2d 610; People v Ranghelle, 69 NY2d 56; People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286, cert denied 368 US 866). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Soto, 269 A.D.2d 614, 704 N.Y.S.2d 830, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2317 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 614 (People v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rosario
173 N.E.2d 881 (New York Court of Appeals, 1961)
People v. Ranghelle
503 N.E.2d 1011 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Banch
608 N.E.2d 1069 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)