People v. Soto

262 A.D.2d 145, 690 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6713
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Soto. Read the opinion of the Court — 253 A.D.2d 359

Opinion

—Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ira Globerman, J.), rendered November 15, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of robbery in the first degree and assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years and 21!s to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s general unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal from his plea of guilty to robbing a White Castle restaurant while armed and wearing a ski mask encompassed a waiver of his right to challenge his sentence as harsh and excessive (People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). Accordingly, appellate review of his sentence is foreclosed (People v Graham, 220 AD2d 215, lv denied 87 NY2d 1019). Were we to review the [146]*146sentence, we would find it was not excessive under the circumstances. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Wallach, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Soto, 262 A.D.2d 145, 690 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6713 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

262 A.D.2d 145 (People v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Graham
220 A.D.2d 215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)