People v. Soto

254 A.D.2d 95, 679 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10685
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Soto. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 A.D.2d 349

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J., at suppression motion; William Leibovitz, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered September 29, 1995, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly declined to submit criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree as a lesser included offense because there was no reasonable view of the evidence that defendant possessed the additional glassine envelopes of heroin without intent to sell them (see, People v Gray, 232 AD2d 179, lv denied 89 NY2d 1093).

The motion court correctly denied defendant’s motion to suppress without a hearing where defendant’s moving papers failed to allege a factual dispute regarding the legality of the police officer’s conduct (see, People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415).

We have considered and rejected defendant’s challenges to the court’s supplemental jury instructions. Concur — Lerner, P. J., Sullivan, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Soto, 254 A.D.2d 95, 679 N.Y.S.2d 281, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10685 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 95 (People v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mendoza
624 N.E.2d 1017 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Gray
232 A.D.2d 179 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)