People v. Soto

239 A.D.2d 250, 658 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5293
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Soto. Read the opinion of the Court — 235 A.D.2d 349

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, .New York County (Herbert Adlerberg, J.), rendered October 7, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 41/2 to 9 years, and imposing a mandatory surcharge of $150, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the mandatory surcharge should be waived on the ground of unreasonable hardship is premature (People v Ramirez, 208 AD2d 381, lv denied 84 NY2d 1037). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Soto, 239 A.D.2d 250, 658 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5293 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

239 A.D.2d 250 (People v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ramirez
208 A.D.2d 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)