People v. Soto

205 A.D.2d 467, 615 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6747
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Soto. Read the opinion of the Court — 183 A.D.2d 926

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Haft, J.), rendered November 14, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault [468]*468in the second degree, unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, and assault in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 15 years to life, lVs to 4 years, and 1 year, respectively, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the matter remanded for a new trial.

As the People concede, the trial court’s submission of a verdict sheet, over defendant’s objection, that, in addition to listing the charged crimes, contained annotations purporting to list the charged crimes’ statutory elements, is reversible error requiring a new trial irrespective of whether defendant was actually prejudiced thereby (People v Kelly, 76 NY2d 1013). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Soto, 205 A.D.2d 467, 615 N.Y.S.2d 989, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

205 A.D.2d 467 (People v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kelly
566 N.E.2d 1159 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)