People v. Soto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Soto

258 A.D.2d 670, 682 N.Y.S.2d 913

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D.2d 670 (People v. Soto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Soto, 258 A.D.2d 670, 682 N.Y.S.2d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), imposed May 19, 1997, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant waived his right to appeal as part of the negotiated plea agreement (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), imposed May 19, 1997, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant waived his right to appeal as part of the negotiated plea agreement (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D.2d 670, 682 N.Y.S.2d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-soto-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack