People v. Hampton
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), dated March 22, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
300 A.D.2d 641 (People v. Hampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.