People v. Robert I.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Robert I.

33 A.D.3d 777, 821 N.Y.S.2d 922

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 17, 2006·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), dated June 17, 2005, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s determination to designate him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Awalt, 17 AD3d 336 [2005]; People v Hampton, 300 AD2d 641 [2002]). Crane, J.E, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hinrichs, J.), dated June 17, 2005, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the County Court’s determination to designate him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Awalt, 17 AD3d 336 [2005]; People v Hampton, 300 AD2d 641 [2002]). Crane, J.E, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.

People v. Robert I., 33 A.D.3d 777, 821 N.Y.S.2d 922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

33 A.D.3d 777 (People v. Robert I.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related