People v. Williams

14 A.D.3d 519, 787 N.Y.S.2d 400, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 157
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 10, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 14 A.D.3d 519 (People v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Williams, 14 A.D.3d 519, 787 N.Y.S.2d 400, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Carroll, J.), rendered June 24, 2002, convicting him of criminal facilitation in the second degree and hindering prosecution in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[520]*520Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Lewis, 64 NY2d 1111, 1112 [1985]; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant committed the crime of hindering prosecution in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are without merit or do not require reversal. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Esguerra
2019 NY Slip Op 8690 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. McArthur
2018 NY Slip Op 311 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Whitehead
140 A.D.3d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Oliphant
117 A.D.3d 1085 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Rayford
80 A.D.3d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. McDonald
79 A.D.3d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Pujji
74 A.D.3d 1100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Martinez
58 A.D.3d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Ramsey
48 A.D.3d 709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Acquista
41 A.D.3d 491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Ragland
36 A.D.3d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Prince
36 A.D.3d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Wiggins
31 A.D.3d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Rabady
28 A.D.3d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Eugene
27 A.D.3d 480 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Warren
27 A.D.3d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.D.3d 519, 787 N.Y.S.2d 400, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-williams-nyappdiv-2005.