People v. Smith
This text of 124 A.D.3d 918 (People v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered February 8, 2013, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of attempted robbery in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). The prosecution presented sufficient evidence establishing that the defendant displayed what appeared to be a firearm while attempting to commit a robbery at a check-cashing store (see Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.15 [4]; People v Lopez, 73 NY2d 214, 220 [1989]; People v Mitchell, 59 AD3d 739, 740 [2009]; People v Barrett, 247 AD2d 626, 626-627 [1998]; People v Washington, 229 AD2d 601, 601-602 [1996]; People v Haney, 162 AD2d 613, *919 613-614 [1990]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
124 A.D.3d 918, 998 N.Y.S.2d 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-smith-nyappdiv-2015.