People v. Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Jenkins

24 A.D.3d 645, 805 N.Y.S.2d 841

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 2005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J), dated April 23, 2004, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]). The court properly assessed 20 points because the defendant engaged in a continuing course of conduct (see People v Thornton, 16 AD3d 1169 [2005]; People v Brown, 302 AD2d 919, 920 [2003]; People v Hampton, 300 AD2d 641 [2002]). Crane, J.P., Luciano, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J), dated April 23, 2004, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court’s determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]). The court properly assessed 20 points because the defendant engaged in a continuing course of conduct (see People v Thornton, 16 AD3d 1169 [2005]; People v Brown, 302 AD2d 919, 920 [2003]; People v Hampton, 300 AD2d 641 [2002]). Crane, J.P., Luciano, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.

People v. Jenkins, 24 A.D.3d 645, 805 N.Y.S.2d 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

24 A.D.3d 645 (People v. Jenkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related