People v. Hitt

7 A.D.3d 813, 776 N.Y.S.2d 886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 24, 2004·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered November 12, 2002, as, upon convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree (three counts) and assault in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Angelo, 3 AD3d 482 [2004]; People v Hampton, 300 AD2d 641 [2002]). H. Miller, J.P., Adams, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hitt, 7 A.D.3d 813, 776 N.Y.S.2d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

7 A.D.3d 813 (People v. Hitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gary
45 A.D.3d 1269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Gandy
35 A.D.3d 1163 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Hammonds
27 A.D.3d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Vacanti
26 A.D.3d 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Heichel
20 A.D.3d 934 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)