People v. Coleman

287 A.D.2d 648, 731 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9824
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 22, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered May 24, 1999, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court properly denied his Batson challenge (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79). The prosecutor’s reason for challenging the subject juror was race-neutral and was supported by the record (cf., People v McIndoe, 277 AD2d 252). The defendant failed to demonstrate that the reason given by the prosecutor was pretextual (see, People v Payne, 88 NY2d 172, 182; People v Allen, 86 NY2d 101, 109-110; People v Richie, 217 AD2d 84, 87).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpre[649]*649served for appellate review or are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Coleman, 287 A.D.2d 648, 731 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

287 A.D.2d 648 (People v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Torres v. Educational Alliance, Inc.
300 A.D.2d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Doyle
295 A.D.2d 446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)