People v. Coleman

266 A.D.2d 227, 697 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11047
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 1, 1999·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Friedman, J.), rendered November 12, 1996, convicting him of attempted assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

As a condition of his plea agreement, the defendant was warned to stay out of trouble pending sentence or the court would impose an enhanced sentence. At sentencing, the court was informed that the defendant had been rearrested and indicted on, inter alia, robbery charges. We reject the defendant’s contention that the court impermissibly enhanced his sentence. Since the defendant had been indicted, the court was assured that there was a legitimate basis for the new charges. Thus, the court properly exercised its discretion in imposing an enhanced sentence (see, People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702; People v Maietta, 80 NY2d 702; People v Ruffin, 208 AD2d 657). S. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Coleman, 266 A.D.2d 227, 697 N.Y.S.2d 683, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 227 (People v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bracy
131 A.D.3d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Warde
45 A.D.3d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Ricketts
27 A.D.3d 488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Coleman v. Rick
281 F. Supp. 2d 549 (E.D. New York, 2003)