People v. Coleman

240 A.D.2d 323, 659 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6753
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 219 A.D.2d 827

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered June 19, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of attempted burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s instruction on criminal facilitation as a possible intended crime, satisfying the element of intent to commit a crime under attempted burglary, is unpreserved (see, People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818, 819), and, in any event, without merit since the charge as a whole conveyed the proper standard (People v Coleman, 70 NY2d 817).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Williams and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Coleman, 240 A.D.2d 323, 659 N.Y.S.2d 754, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 323 (People v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Coleman
517 N.E.2d 1319 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Nuccie
441 N.E.2d 1111 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)