People v. Coleman

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Coleman

517 N.E.2d 1319, 70 N.Y.2d 817, 523 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 19043

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 12, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by134 cases

This text of 517 N.E.2d 1319 (People v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Coleman, 517 N.E.2d 1319, 70 N.Y.2d 817, 523 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 19043 (N.Y. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

*819 Appellant was convicted after a jury trial of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03). The only issue raised on this appeal is whether the trial court’s charge on the issue of causation deprived defendant of a fair trial. Defendant contends that two isolated remarks made by the trial court, during its instructions, one of them unpreserved, removed from the jury the factual question of whether the shooting caused the death of Raul Melendes. Taken out of context, it is possible to find error in the court’s comments. When its instructions are viewed in their entirety, however, the charge was unquestionably a correct statement of the law and reserved the question of causation to the jury and upon our review of the record, there is no basis for concluding that the jury could not follow the court’s instructions (see, People v Adams, 69 NY2d 805, 806; People v Goodfriend, 64 NY2d 695, 697; People v Canty, 60 NY2d 831, 832).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

*819 Appellant was convicted after a jury trial of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03). The only issue raised on this appeal is whether the trial court’s charge on the issue of causation deprived defendant of a fair trial. Defendant contends that two isolated remarks made by the trial court, during its instructions, one of them unpreserved, removed from the jury the factual question of whether the shooting caused the death of Raul Melendes. Taken out of context, it is possible to find error in the court’s comments. When its instructions are viewed in their entirety, however, the charge was unquestionably a correct statement of the law and reserved the question of causation to the jury and upon our review of the record, there is no basis for concluding that the jury could not follow the court’s instructions (see, People v Adams, 69 NY2d 805, 806; People v Goodfriend, 64 NY2d 695, 697; People v Canty, 60 NY2d 831, 832).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

517 N.E.2d 1319, 70 N.Y.2d 817, 523 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 19043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-coleman-ny-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack